Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
98 messages Options
12345
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

Gary Lewis
Administrator
ArdWrknTrk wrote
But not today. It's dismal, rainy and windy.
This is the third day in a row for rain.  It has been off and on, but mostly on.  However it started in earnest last night and rained literally all night.  And still raining.  Awaiting the light of day to see how far out of its banks the creek on the back of the property is.  And it is "up to" 43 degrees.

So no way I've had the truck out for a bit.  But if I get the doors finished tomorrow maybe we can take it for a ride on Saturday when the weather is supposed to be dry and in the 60's.  Maybe get to listen to the 6.5's in the dampened doors.
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile

Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
Blue: 2015 F150 Platinum 4x4 SuperCrew wearing Blue Jeans & sporting a 3.5L EB & Max Tow
Big Blue: 1985 F250HD 4x4: 460/ZF5/3.55's, D60 w/Ox locker & 10.25 Sterling/Trutrac, Blue Top & Borgeson, & EEC-V MAF/SEFI

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

1986F150Six
Administrator
<quote author="Gary Lewis">
ArdWrknTrk wrote
So no way I've had the truck out for a bit.  But if I get the doors finished tomorrow maybe we can take it for a ride on Saturday when the weather is supposed to be dry and in the 60's.  Maybe get to listen to the 6.5's in the dampened doors.
Take Janey to Ron's for a chili-cheeseburger with homemade fries! Ummm!
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

Gary Lewis
Administrator
Lol!!!!     We are standing in line to vote literally across the street from Ron’s and as I pulled this up Janey said “A bowl of Ron’s chili sure would be nice!”
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile

Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
Blue: 2015 F150 Platinum 4x4 SuperCrew wearing Blue Jeans & sporting a 3.5L EB & Max Tow
Big Blue: 1985 F250HD 4x4: 460/ZF5/3.55's, D60 w/Ox locker & 10.25 Sterling/Trutrac, Blue Top & Borgeson, & EEC-V MAF/SEFI

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

1986F150Six
Administrator
Gary Lewis wrote
Lol!!!!     We are standing in line to vote literally across the street from Ron’s and as I pulled this up Janey said “A bowl of Ron’s chili sure would be nice!”
Great minds thinking alike?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

86 1/2 Brutus
In reply to this post by Gary Lewis
Gary.  i just read a question you asked me a few posts back about putting the 6x9's that are already in your doors where they are located in Brutus.  Yes by all means if you want to cut it, 6x9'ssound great in those doors for some reason.  As far as the vent at the bottom,   i can check to see if they are intact, but you are welcome to the door pockets from the parts truck, they fit right in
Nick and George
1986 1/2  F150 XLT Lariat 4X2  300 Six  - C6 - 3:08 in a 8.8 -  Fully Loaded - 8 Foot Box
Owned since new
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

Gary Lewis
Administrator
George - Thanks for the offer on the door pockets.  My doors don't have any vents so I'd have to cut them to use your pockets, but then I'd have to reinforce the door as I'm afraid that would take out some strength.
 However, I'd probably almost for sure want to cut the tweeter out as it doesn't make sense to have the highs coming out down there.

As for installing the 6x9's where they are on Brutus, I looked at doing that and it would really take a lot of cutting and I don't want to do that.  Instead I'll try the 6 1/2"s in the doors and see how they sound.  And then consider placing the 6x9's in the lower part of the door as well.

Do you have a picture showing where the vent is in your door?  I mean the metal part of the door where you'll put the 6x9?  I want to see what is there in my door to make sure there won't be interference.
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile

Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
Blue: 2015 F150 Platinum 4x4 SuperCrew wearing Blue Jeans & sporting a 3.5L EB & Max Tow
Big Blue: 1985 F250HD 4x4: 460/ZF5/3.55's, D60 w/Ox locker & 10.25 Sterling/Trutrac, Blue Top & Borgeson, & EEC-V MAF/SEFI

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

ArdWrknTrk
Administrator
Gary,
Aren't there specific places moulded right in to your highliner for speakers?
I'm not sure why I'd want a speaker firing at the side of my seat.
 Jim,
Lil'Red is a '87 F250 HD, 4.10's, 1356 4x4, Zf-5, 3G, PMGR, Saginaw PS, desmogged with a Holley 80508 and Performer intake.
Too much other stuff to mention.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

Gary Lewis
Administrator
Jim - Yes, there are places molded into the Highliner, but they are for 4" speakers, which will be the upper midrange and tweeters.  But George and I are talking about the possible inclusion of 6x9's in the door for bass.

I'm not quite sure where the vent is in the '87 and later doors, but IIRC it is in towards the rear of the door.  The pic below shows a possible place to put a 6x9.  But the horizontal line near the top of the center circle is my best measurement on where the bottom of the window is.  And the circle is the magnet, which protrudes 3" from the mounting surface.  But the window is only 2 1/2" inside the door.

So that mounting position is suspect.  And it assumes that the '87 door pockets would clear the speaker if it is mounted to the outside of the inner sheet metal of the door.

But if it would work there's ~4" from the inside edge of the door to the fabric of the seat.  Obviously that's not ideal.

Now to work on the door lock linkage as I just got "locked out".  Luckily the window was open, so I stood on the step bar, reached the inside door handle and bolt laying on the floor, re-attached it to the release mechanism, and was able to get it to open.  Just.  The rod that pushes the lock open bowed pretty badly.  

Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile

Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
Blue: 2015 F150 Platinum 4x4 SuperCrew wearing Blue Jeans & sporting a 3.5L EB & Max Tow
Big Blue: 1985 F250HD 4x4: 460/ZF5/3.55's, D60 w/Ox locker & 10.25 Sterling/Trutrac, Blue Top & Borgeson, & EEC-V MAF/SEFI

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

ArdWrknTrk
Administrator
I tell you what.... when it dries up and I go to cut out the Boom Mats I'll take pictures with a tape measure showing the vents, door pockets, and anything else you like.


There's a good reason to use the mounting collars that come with the speakers.
So the magnets don't bottom out inside the doors.
I may well have the ones from mine, because I mounted them directly to the front of the box behind my seat.
 Jim,
Lil'Red is a '87 F250 HD, 4.10's, 1356 4x4, Zf-5, 3G, PMGR, Saginaw PS, desmogged with a Holley 80508 and Performer intake.
Too much other stuff to mention.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

kramttocs
Administrator
This post was updated on .
In reply to this post by Gary Lewis
There is a photo of the vent in this thread on FTE

Personally I wouldn't consider cutting into the door. Why not put a low profile all-in-one sub (or 4 ) under the bench? I am really happy with the Kicker 11HS8.
Scott
'Camano' 1986 F250 Supercab XLT Lariat 460/C6
'Chanute' 1980 F350 C&C 400/NP 435 - Gin Pole

But there ain't nothin' wrong with the radio
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

86 1/2 Brutus
Ok, thats a problem, the speakers have to go behind, not in front.  it's the same as the hack job 6x9's in Brutus's doors.  the factory speakers were mounted up front, but the speakers i have now have to be mounted from the rear.  the door pocket sits flush with the door
Nick and George
1986 1/2  F150 XLT Lariat 4X2  300 Six  - C6 - 3:08 in a 8.8 -  Fully Loaded - 8 Foot Box
Owned since new
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

86 1/2 Brutus
my concern is window clearence
Nick and George
1986 1/2  F150 XLT Lariat 4X2  300 Six  - C6 - 3:08 in a 8.8 -  Fully Loaded - 8 Foot Box
Owned since new
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

Gary Lewis
Administrator
I think you'll have a problem clearing the window.  The magnet on these Sony speakers is ~3 1/4" in diameter.  And since magnet size has a bearing on sound, I doubt you'll want to go smaller.  So I think you'll have problems.  But let us know how it goes.
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile

Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
Blue: 2015 F150 Platinum 4x4 SuperCrew wearing Blue Jeans & sporting a 3.5L EB & Max Tow
Big Blue: 1985 F250HD 4x4: 460/ZF5/3.55's, D60 w/Ox locker & 10.25 Sterling/Trutrac, Blue Top & Borgeson, & EEC-V MAF/SEFI

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

86 1/2 Brutus
Gary;  that is a concern of mine too is magnet clearence..  Sorry, I have to setp up onto my soap box again, well, not really, i'm not condescending when it comes to things like this, or at least i hope i'm not.  If i appear to be, please let me know.   Magnet size has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with sound quality.  It is a power handling thing. The magnet type does have an affect on sound however.   Now-a-days, they go overboard with  in trying to get people to yet again buy there speakers.  A boy at work was bragging to me that he just bought a pair of subs that have 89lb magnets.

First and foremost, it is the speakers voice coil that is mostly going to determine it's power handling.  The diameter of it and the gauge of wire used to wind the coil.

Do you remember me telling you about the kid from work that has a boom system in his truck and he came to my house and his jaw hitting the floor when he heard my bass at a whopping 15 watts.  The magnets in my speakers are relatively small.  They are Alnico magnets.  I'm sure you have seen them, they are the magnets  on the old speakers that are small and have what looks like a horse shoe over them, hence the term horse shoe magnets.


These type of magnets are my preference as the bass response is going to be second to none with this type of speaker.     the magnetic field on this type of speaker is more prevelent on the north and south side of the magnet, yet can handle little power but is very efficient.

To improve on this, they came out with the alnico IV magnet which you can see in my speakers right here


If you notice, the 12" woofer at the botttom has a large rather skinny magnet, this is the alnico iv.  Power handling was increased to 30 watts.  The 10" woofer you see top right is the next gen after alnico iv.  Although it is still alnico iv, the magnet is square.  This is what started the magnetic field to cover more area of the voice coil, power handling on these , they were able to get up to 50 watts yet still very efficient and were still able to maintain that lush alnico bass.    ( I reallly wish i could hang out with you guys.  Ya'll would have some of the best sounding bullnoses around)
anyway.  Into the 1970's we go.

In and about 1972 or so, 2 men, David Hafler of Dynaco, then later hafler, and Bob Carver of Phase Linear, then later Carver were able to break the 200 watt per channel using transistors.  it was still at this time that both McIntosh and Sansui were still making there higher power stuff vacuum tube.  Once they got transistors to produce this amount of wattage, something had to be done with the speakers.  Speakers of old cannot handle this power ( unless you are crazy like me and dump over 80 watts into a speaker that can handle 15 and not blow them) but this is the sole ability of the amplifier, as my amps are hand built, they do not clip.  I also have heat sinks glued to the back and front of the magnets to help dicipate the heat.  Remember watts is heat as well, but as in my usual style, i'm getting off subject here

so once they broke 200 watts is when they came out with the ceramic magnet which is the style of magnets we know of today.  The magnetic field of these types utilize the entire voice coil and there larger size they were able to get speakers to handle the power of the new solid state power amps.

Now comes the fun part.  lets talk about voice coil size and spl.   During this time period, 1972 and prior, as you know, speakers were very large or you simply had a console stereo.  For the reasons given above, the alnico type speakers require large cabinets to give the full deep bass response of the then low powered tube and first generation solid state amplifiers, but these speakers were efficient so they required little power to drive loud.

Once they had the power, they were able to reduce the size of the speaker cabinet with the new ceramic magnets.  They could handle the power the new amplifiers could give them, but these types of speakers are much harder to drive.  What the main focus was is stability in the bass which they had at this point.  it takes quite a bit of amplifier power to drive bass correctly.  Bass is very hard to do, even today so they rely heavly on power rather then speaker cabinet configuration to drive bass in these now smaller cabinets.  All of this so you dont have a big bulky speaker system sitting in your living room, and it was at this point where the console stereo began to go away

Nothing has changed really, although a modern speaker, and we are talking 1972 and later does have more solid , deep bass then the an average run of the mill speaker of yesteryear.  But these new speakers require much more power and the power has to be very stable in order to compete with the better speakers from yesteryear.

Over the years as amplifier power increased, the speaker boxes got smaller and smaller until they got to the point they are at now.  Bear in mind, these speakers do not play much louder then the ones of yesteryear, they just have better bass in a small box, again relying heavily on shear output power.  hence the Class D amplifier.  while no attention is paid to sound quality, it is rather power and nothing more.  We have the class D to thank for Boom Cars.    The class D we also have to thank for having 40 to 50 watts in our head units, but you know my feelings on the class D amp, although i have no use for them as they are untrue to the source, they do have there place.  finally we can have decent power with just a car stereo and a pair of speakers.  but i'm getting off track again

Now lets talk voice coil size.  Voice coil and magnet size is where your power handling comes from and also the way the speaker " talks "    I'm going to use a 12 inch woofer as an example here.
Have you ever noticed some speakers have very small dust caps, some larger and some very large?
This effects the frequencies the speaker can reproduce. and this is the main thing i look for when designing any type of speaker system and will determine weather a 2 or 3 way system will need to be used.

The outside edge of the speaker cone is what reproduces the lower bass, as the cone gets toward the middle is where it begins to climb in frequency, so if you have a 12" woofer with a very small say 1 inch coil, this type of speaker will " talk "  it will produce low and mid/midrange frequencies.  As this area around the coil gets larger, it effects the speakers ability to " talk " which is generally why a midrange speaker is added.  A subwoofer has a very large coil that in some cases is almost half the size of the actual cone itself and they don't " talk " very much at all.   With the larger coil, the speaker will appear to have much better bass because they simply cant " talk " and the speaker does not reproduce the upper frequencies, hence the amplifier has an easier time driving the bass.    This is also why we use crossover networks to further eliminate frequencies we dont want the particular driver to reproduce.  

That and that alone is why i dont particularly care for a so called subwoofer system.  having a system that utilizes a subwoofer leaves a hole in the sound which is why, if you read Jim's post on cab upgrades where i ramble pretty  much about the same thing there.  Jim is using a small subwoofer for bass augmentation only.  He has a pair of 6x9's in a box behind his seat and 2 door speakers.   The 6x9's in the box behind his seat is where most of the bass and the fullness is going to come from because these speakers are allowed to " talk " and reproduce the lower midrange frequencies that subwoofer speakers simply cant

One thing about speakers i have designed, and have done many, everybody tells me they cant hear the crossover which is what i want, the speaker needs to speak to you in a full natural way.
These speakers that are called subwoofers, that term is used incorrectly now-a-days are actually not true subwoofers, it is just a woofer, nothing more with all mid and high frequencies removed.
A true subwoofer is intended to reproduce frequencies below what woofer can't do, and this is going to be 40 cycles and below.  The subwoofer was originally intended for use for people who listen to classical music.  In classical music, the bass is produced by a chello or what we know as " a stand up bass"  these instruments can go down to 32 cycles which is very hard for a woofer to do.  The pipe organ " the speaker killer" the lowest note on a pipe organ is 19 cycles.  You need a dedicated speaker to do these.  Rock, pop and country music and yes even rap music do not have any frequencies that go into this relm.  The absolute lowest note an electric bass guitar can reproduce is around 50 cycles which any woofer will do better then a subwoofer.  Believe it or not, rap music dosent even go down this far, it starts to cut off at about 60 cycles which is the easiest frequency for any amplifier to do, its just way over exaggerated.
But like i said somewhere above the narrower the frequency you give the speaker, the louder  and more stable it will play which is why people use subs with rap music.  if the speaker tries to talk, it will muddy up the bass, eliminating the talking frequencies, the speaker can concentrate on bass frequencies only.

Now lets talk about Brutus and why i want to put a speaker in the bottom of the door.   As you know, he has 6x9's in his doors.  They sound very very good and have very respectable bass at normal levels, but once you begin to drive harder, the speaker starts to fall apart in a sense because the woofer part is just trying to do to many frequencies.    I still have to see exactly what is going to fit in there and do a bunch of math and such, but the speaker that will go in the bottom of the door will be the system's woofer, there will be a coil inline with the speaker to slightly eliminate the very upper frequencies which a large speaker does not do very well.  The 6x9's in the door will have a coil across the speaker along with a capacitor in line to eliminate any and all bass frequencies i want removed from the speaker hence turning the 6x9 into a midbass and up.  This will give the ability to play a bit louder with more stability and clarity because the 6x9's no longer have to try to reproduce bass

Now lets talk about Big Blue.  Lets forget about the 6x9's that are in there right now and concentrate on the 6 inch door speakers.    In this case, if you were to use the 6 inch in the doors, along with the 4 1/2's in the headliner, you will get nice full sound with the exception of bass.  The door is just to large for a 6 inch speaker.  In this case, a small subwoofer speaker would be needed, or what jim did with the 6x9's in the box behind the seat..    Being your doors are already hacked up, i would go with the 6x9's in the doors but in the place of the 6's.  Those 6x9's that you have look like they would have some decent bass.  if you went in this direction, i dont think you would need anything else.   In my situation, i do need a bass speaker, or woofer, or whatever you want to call it.  The speakers i am using in the doors are actually Ford speakers from a 95 crown vic.  As far as sound quality, believe it or not, they sound better then just about anything out there until you get down on them which is why i need another speaker in the bottom of the door.  i dont think you will have this problem with the 6x9's you have

Believe it or not, those factory 6 inch speakers that came in the doors of the trucks, and door speakers in the cars actually make incredible midrange speakers if crossed over correctly.

Sorry for the rambling, but with all my experience and knowledge, none of it does any good if i cant share it.





Nick and George
1986 1/2  F150 XLT Lariat 4X2  300 Six  - C6 - 3:08 in a 8.8 -  Fully Loaded - 8 Foot Box
Owned since new
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

86 1/2 Brutus
In reply to this post by 66gtk
Nick and I did some research on the aurora radio's.  For what they are charging for these, i would not be happy in any way shape or form with the performance.  These radios are loaded with about
$50 worth of cheap china module kits which we are very familiar with..  Basically he bought just about the cheapest class d amplifier kit and shoved it in the radio.  I'm familiar with these kits and can be picked up all  day long for about 15 bucks.  I've also heard them.  you would be much better off getting one of those classic car looking radio's for 250 bucks and put the rest of the money toward something else.   It is simply not worth it, especially if the radio goes out, there is no guarantee replacement parts would be available
Nick and George
1986 1/2  F150 XLT Lariat 4X2  300 Six  - C6 - 3:08 in a 8.8 -  Fully Loaded - 8 Foot Box
Owned since new
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

Gary Lewis
Administrator
In reply to this post by 86 1/2 Brutus
George - I've read and re-read your post and think I understand.

I'm sitting here wondering if the door pockets could be reversed, meaning that the right one would be used on the left door and vice versa.  If so, I think you could easily put a 6x9 in the bottom of the front of the door.  But, I'm not sure that the rear of the door pockets would clear the seat.  Or that the shape of the pockets would work.  Can you check?

As for Big Blue, what I'm thinking about doing is to put a powered "subwoofer" (I agree with you that's a misnomer) under the seat.  Something like the Sound Ordinance B-8PTD might do it, and the existing head unit has sub-outs.  Then use the front channel to power the 6 1/2's and the rear channel to power the 4" speakers in the Highliner, which would use up the little bit of power that head unit has.

I'm not looking for a "serious" system.  I've been there and done that previously.  But I want a decent sound in the truck for the long trips I hope to take in it to Colorado and elsewhere to use it.  And since I have the Sony system and speakers and the Highliner on its way I'm just looking to augment that setup.

We plan to take the truck out tomorrow for a drive and I hope to have the 6 1/2's in for that test.  I'll report back.

Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile

Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
Blue: 2015 F150 Platinum 4x4 SuperCrew wearing Blue Jeans & sporting a 3.5L EB & Max Tow
Big Blue: 1985 F250HD 4x4: 460/ZF5/3.55's, D60 w/Ox locker & 10.25 Sterling/Trutrac, Blue Top & Borgeson, & EEC-V MAF/SEFI

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

86 1/2 Brutus
When  i go outside today, iill check on the parts truck if they can be reversed or not and let you know.  now you have me thinking too:-)
Nick and George
1986 1/2  F150 XLT Lariat 4X2  300 Six  - C6 - 3:08 in a 8.8 -  Fully Loaded - 8 Foot Box
Owned since new
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

ArdWrknTrk
Administrator
I honestly don't think there's room between seat hinge and door for me to fit the left pocket on the right, but I can give it a try when I remove the panels.

They seem pretty rectangular so I don't think that's the issue.
 Jim,
Lil'Red is a '87 F250 HD, 4.10's, 1356 4x4, Zf-5, 3G, PMGR, Saginaw PS, desmogged with a Holley 80508 and Performer intake.
Too much other stuff to mention.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

86 1/2 Brutus
This post was updated on .
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Nick and George
1986 1/2  F150 XLT Lariat 4X2  300 Six  - C6 - 3:08 in a 8.8 -  Fully Loaded - 8 Foot Box
Owned since new
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Factory Radio restoration and Modification by Nick

Gary Lewis
Administrator
George - Do you have Paypal?  If so, email me your Paypal account number and I'll pre-pay you $60 for Dad's radio.
Gary, AKA "Gary fellow": Profile

Dad's: '81 F150 Ranger XLT 4x4: Down for restomod: Full-roller "stroked 351M" w/Trick Flow heads & intake, EEC-V SEFI/E4OD/3.50 gears w/Kevlar clutches
Blue: 2015 F150 Platinum 4x4 SuperCrew wearing Blue Jeans & sporting a 3.5L EB & Max Tow
Big Blue: 1985 F250HD 4x4: 460/ZF5/3.55's, D60 w/Ox locker & 10.25 Sterling/Trutrac, Blue Top & Borgeson, & EEC-V MAF/SEFI

12345