3-D printer Fog light bezel has been made and shipped!

[Gary Lewis]

Actually the Shapways lettering is Horrible.

The letters seemed to "melt together"

and the lettering from the one I got was "altered" to get them to resolve...

I did some sanding using 600 on a glass plate. Didn't take too long to get down to the letters, and as you can see below they cleaned up a bit. But, as Ron points out, they aren't nearly as crisp as those on his printed version nor on his original.

Here's his pic with the original and his printed version. Note the crisp lettering in both cases:

Now here's my Shapeways #1 with some sanding. Note that the letters run together - although they appear to be in the correct places. I think the running-together is a result of Shapeways tweaking the lettering. So, maybe with some help from Shapeways?

 

[ArdWrknTrk]

I did some sanding using 600 on a glass plate. Didn't take too long to get down to the letters, and as you can see below they cleaned up a bit. But, as Ron points out, they aren't nearly as crisp as those on his printed version nor on his original.

Here's his pic with the original and his printed version. Note the crisp lettering in both cases:

Now here's my Shapeways #1 with some sanding. Note that the letters run together - although they appear to be in the correct places. I think the running-together is a result of Shapeways tweaking the lettering. So, maybe with some help from Shapeways?

I'd be tempted to just pull a mold off the NOS one and cast them rather than trying to have one created from scratch.

3D printing is great for realizing imagined things. (Prototyping or one offs)

But if you have an object *already* and want to make a few more just like it....

The studs on the back are perfect sprues and the cost of those materials is trivial compared to design time, production, shipping, etc.

[Gary Lewis]

I'd be tempted to just pull a mold off the NOS one and cast them rather than trying to have one created from scratch.

3D printing is great for realizing imagined things. (Prototyping or one offs)

But if you have an object *already* and want to make a few more just like it....

The studs on the back are perfect sprues and the cost of those materials is trivial compared to design time, production, shipping, etc.

Where would be the fun in that?

Actually, that might be a good way to do it. But, I'm well into this so want to keep going. It is my first 3D printing project, at least the first that I've printed, and I'd like to see it work out.

Having said that, the one that I have is usable, and might find its way onto Big Blue. No, it isn't "right", but tucked up under the steering wheel it will be hard to see that it isn't.

[PetesPonies]

Where would be the fun in that?

Actually, that might be a good way to do it. But, I'm well into this so want to keep going. It is my first 3D printing project, at least the first that I've printed, and I'd like to see it work out.

Having said that, the one that I have is usable, and might find its way onto Big Blue. No, it isn't "right", but tucked up under the steering wheel it will be hard to see that it isn't.

I have made several items for cars by molding. I even sold a few. Making a mold is fun, at least when they turn out right :)

[Ford F834]

I did some sanding using 600 on a glass plate. Didn't take too long to get down to the letters, and as you can see below they cleaned up a bit. But, as Ron points out, they aren't nearly as crisp as those on his printed version nor on his original.

Here's his pic with the original and his printed version. Note the crisp lettering in both cases:

Now here's my Shapeways #1 with some sanding. Note that the letters run together - although they appear to be in the correct places. I think the running-together is a result of Shapeways tweaking the lettering. So, maybe with some help from Shapeways?

I am a little confused about what is going on here... Gary and Ron, you each created a shape file and had it printed by the same company (shapeways) is that correct? Did you both choose the same material? Gary's is definitely more like the original but Ron's came out much cleaner and crisper and appears to have less of a texture problem. The letters running together is going to make it very hard with painting the faces. I think if you revise the file it would be worth separating them even if it is at the sacrifice of size/space accuracy. As much as I like the correctness I don't think your eye would see it unless side by side with the original.

[Gary Lewis]

I am a little confused about what is going on here... Gary and Ron, you each created a shape file and had it printed by the same company (shapeways) is that correct? Did you both choose the same material? Gary's is definitely more like the original but Ron's came out much cleaner and crisper and appears to have less of a texture problem. The letters running together is going to make it very hard with painting the faces. I think if you revise the file it would be worth separating them even if it is at the sacrifice of size/space accuracy. As much as I like the correctness I don't think your eye would see it unless side by side with the original.

Yes, and no. I created the .stl file and Ron submitted it to one place for printing and I submitted it to Shapeways. Both companies had problems with the letters, and took different approaches to resolving the problems. Shapeways made the letters thicker, and Ron's company did something else - which resulted in crisper letters but in different places.

Mine was printed via "selective laser sintering nylon powder layer by layer." But there are 59 other materials, each with their own production method, to choose from. And, each has differing tolerances for things like the letters - which they call extrusions.

I'm not sure what material or process Ron's was printed with, but it is smoother and the letters much more crisp. So, I'm planning to contact Shapeways to see if they can help me figure out how to do the same.

[ArdWrknTrk]

Yes, and no. I created the .stl file and Ron submitted it to one place for printing and I submitted it to Shapeways. Both companies had problems with the letters, and took different approaches to resolving the problems. Shapeways made the letters thicker, and Ron's company did something else - which resulted in crisper letters but in different places.

Mine was printed via "selective laser sintering nylon powder layer by layer." But there are 59 other materials, each with their own production method, to choose from. And, each has differing tolerances for things like the letters - which they call extrusions.

I'm not sure what material or process Ron's was printed with, but it is smoother and the letters much more crisp. So, I'm planning to contact Shapeways to see if they can help me figure out how to do the same.

The acrylic would be a much better material to deal with your problems.

Even given its shortcomings in this application.....

Interesting to read that Shapeways does this with visible light and then does some post process curing with UV.

Looking at the Formlabs printer you can draw some conclusions about what wavelengths affect their resins.

 

[Gary Lewis]

The acrylic would be a much better material to deal with your problems.

Even given its shortcomings in this application.....

Interesting to read that Shapeways does this with visible light and then does some post process curing with UV.

Looking at the Formlabs printer you can draw some conclusions about what wavelengths affect their resins.

I just sent this to Shapeways:

First, let me say that this isn't a complaint. This was my very first 3D print and I'm stoked. But, I think the results can be better with your help.

When I initially uploaded the file it said that there were problems with the letters being too "fine" and I hit the button to fix that and the system said they were then OK. In fact, in the drawing I was shown they looked good. However, in actuality they are coarse and run together. So, I'm trying to figure out what to do about it. In addition, the overall texture of the part is rough and I'd like it to be smoother.

I've attached several pictures, with the first being Head-on Capture, which is from my TurboCAD display. It shows what I want the letters to look like, and taking some measurements they stand .031" off the face of the part, are .007" at the thinnest, and there's .007" between them at the closest point.

The second pic (Shapeways 1 Sanded Fill Flash) is what the letters look like having been "fixed" by your process and printed in Strong & Flexible. (Note that I sanded on them to smooth the tops some.) And, it appears to me that the "A" and "M" of LAMPS are smaller than the other letters.

The 3rd pic (3rd Round Result) shows the actual part I'm trying to replicate on the left, and a version printed by a friend of mine via one of your competitors on the right. Note how much more crisp the letters are on his version. However, I do know that whomever printed it had to do something to fix the letters, and in the process even moved the FOG LAMPS lettering up.

So, what I need help with is what needs to be done to my file in order to get better quality letters as well as a smoother overall finish. Is another material better? This is a decorative part so isn't under stress, and the only reason for the studs on the back is to gingerly fasten it to another panel. But, it will be in trucks that will be parked outside, so will see UV light.

I'm happy to make another pass or two, but need your guidance on what to change.

Thanks,

Gary

[Ford F834]

I just sent this to Shapeways:

First, let me say that this isn't a complaint. This was my very first 3D print and I'm stoked. But, I think the results can be better with your help.

When I initially uploaded the file it said that there were problems with the letters being too "fine" and I hit the button to fix that and the system said they were then OK. In fact, in the drawing I was shown they looked good. However, in actuality they are coarse and run together. So, I'm trying to figure out what to do about it. In addition, the overall texture of the part is rough and I'd like it to be smoother.

I've attached several pictures, with the first being Head-on Capture, which is from my TurboCAD display. It shows what I want the letters to look like, and taking some measurements they stand .031" off the face of the part, are .007" at the thinnest, and there's .007" between them at the closest point.

The second pic (Shapeways 1 Sanded Fill Flash) is what the letters look like having been "fixed" by your process and printed in Strong & Flexible. (Note that I sanded on them to smooth the tops some.) And, it appears to me that the "A" and "M" of LAMPS are smaller than the other letters.

The 3rd pic (3rd Round Result) shows the actual part I'm trying to replicate on the left, and a version printed by a friend of mine via one of your competitors on the right. Note how much more crisp the letters are on his version. However, I do know that whomever printed it had to do something to fix the letters, and in the process even moved the FOG LAMPS lettering up.

So, what I need help with is what needs to be done to my file in order to get better quality letters as well as a smoother overall finish. Is another material better? This is a decorative part so isn't under stress, and the only reason for the studs on the back is to gingerly fasten it to another panel. But, it will be in trucks that will be parked outside, so will see UV light.

I'm happy to make another pass or two, but need your guidance on what to change.

Thanks,

Gary

Well explained Gary, and a good test of Shapeways customer service. I did not realize that there were so many options for materials and processes.

Do you think the UV part is a big issue? I imagined the part being painted before use.

Is it just me or is Ron's example much smaller than the original? Did yours come out the correct size?

This is exciting stuff, and I hope Shapeways can help improve on it.

[Gary Lewis]

Well explained Gary, and a good test of Shapeways customer service. I did not realize that there were so many options for materials and processes.

Do you think the UV part is a big issue? I imagined the part being painted before use.

Is it just me or is Ron's example much smaller than the original? Did yours come out the correct size?

This is exciting stuff, and I hope Shapeways can help improve on it.

Ron said his printed part is the same size as his NOS one. And mine was an absolutely perfect fit in the holes in the instrument bezel, so I know it is the correct size - or at least the studs are in the right places.

But I don't think the UV is an issue, so suspect we will go acrylic. And, while I was hoping to use the piece w/o painting the black part, that could easily be done.

Speaking of painting, is there any way you can think to easily dip the part in a tray of silver to paint the bead evenly, and then put it down on something with the white paint to get the tops of the letters?

And, this is exciting. I think it is way cool to draw something up on the computer and have it come to you in the mail. The only thing that would be better would be to have your own printer, and I'm not yet ready for that. However, Bill has one, so.......