Jump to content
Bullnose Forums

Gary's Trailer Quest


Recommended Posts

Guys - I'm on a quest to buy a 20' car-hauling trailer and could use some advice. But first, my rationale. Heretofore I've borrowed trailers. The first one I borrowed to bring a truck home shed the tread on two tires - in my driveway after a 200 mile trip, so I split the replacement costs with the owner. Another I borrowed didn't have a spare so I bought one since I was going on a 200 mile round-trip. Then when I borrowed that trailer the next time the pigtail had been accidentally cut off, and several other problems presented themselves.

And the big one was when a friend said "I have just the trailer for you to take to Florida to get Big Blue - but it needs a little wiring." However, it didn't have an inch of good wire on it nor any lights as it had been in a grass fire. Plus there were just a few bearing problems. Long story short, with less expense than it would have cost to rent a U-Haul, Brandon got his trailer fixed and I enjoyed a very solid trailer for the trip. Thanks again, Bruno. :nabble_anim_handshake:

However, I want to have my own trailer so when I want to do something I can do it w/o finding a trailer to borrow and then fixing it, or at the very least checking the bearings as no one ever knows the last time they were lubed. So, as said, I'm on a quest. And, I've realized that there are trailers and then there are trailers. Most of what I've found, used and new, are on 3500# axles with a GCWR of ~7000# and the whole trailer weighs about 2200 lbs. So you are left with only 4800 as the capacity, and Big Blue weighs about 6500 lbs. Obviously that is a non-starter.

Next up are trailers on 5200# axles with a GVWR of ~10,000 lbs and a trailer weight of ~2500. Now we are talking. However, if I load Big Blue up with a tent camper and want to go overlanding with my son in Colorado I'll be pushing the GVWR of the trailer. Further, when I get 10 - 15% of the trailer's weight on the tongue, as you are supposed to do, there's more load on the front axle than on the rear axle. But, the 225/75 R15 LRD tires these trailers use have a max load of 5080 for one axle, and it would be very easy to overload the front tires and axle, which I do not want to do.

So, I'm looking at trailers with 7200# axles and a GVWR of 14,000 lbs. Subract 3600 lbs for the trailer and you still have over 10K lbs for the load. And the 235/80 R16 LRE tires have a max load rating of 7040 for each axle, meaning there's a safe margin even when you move the load to the front for tongue weight.

And then there's the winch. Most manufacturers put a "winch plate" on the very front of the deck. But I think the winch needs to be on a stand to get the winch ~1' above the deck so the winch line isn't dragging on the deck. Which brings me to my question: What length of dovetail to put on the trailer? Most companies will do a 2', a 3', or a 4'. One of the manufacturers said a 4' is a car hauler and a 2' is an equipment hauler. But, I didn't think to ask him why.

I think a 4' dove is the way to go because it gives a more gentle slope that makes loading easier. And, more importantly, the smaller angle should give less of a chance for the winch line to hit the break between the level deck and the angled dove.

Your thoughts, please? :nabble_anim_jump:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary,

A common suspension set up we use here (you probably do too), has linkages between the axles to allow them to float, while connected to each other.

This way they can travel over uneven ground, curbs, ditches etc. & still have an equal loading on each wheel.

Or, if the hitch height isn't level, there is still no overload on either axle (other than from the way the trailer might be loaded).

Here is a link with one example (this is an Aussie site)......http://www.trojanparts.com.au/index.asp?pageID=2145829335

Without this equalizing, you are forced to go up in axle capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary,

A common suspension set up we use here (you probably do too), has linkages between the axles to allow them to float, while connected to each other.

This way they can travel over uneven ground, curbs, ditches etc. & still have an equal loading on each wheel.

Or, if the hitch height isn't level, there is still no overload on either axle (other than from the way the trailer might be loaded).

Here is a link with one example (this is an Aussie site)......http://www.trojanparts.com.au/index.asp?pageID=2145829335

Without this equalizing, you are forced to go up in axle capacity.

Ken - Thanks. We use the same setup. However, it isn’t perfect. I recently loaded a minivan on the trailer I have borrowed and from the way the tires bulged we obviously had more weight on the front axle than the rear. It was a front wheel drive minivan so had a lot of weight in front and it was long enough we didn’t have any options with where to position it on the trailer. And the level of the trailer was whatever it was because this was a rescue mission late in the evening using a borrowed trailer with a friend’s truck. But, it wasn’t too far off of level and yet the tires told us we had more weight in front than back.

We made that trip fine, but I’m hearing way too many stories from people I know well about blown tires while towing. Not only did they have to stop and replace the tire, in some cases the loss of one tire led to the loss of the other on the same side. And they were stuck. I don’t want to have that experience. 🙈 That’s the impetus for overkill on the trailer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ken - Thanks. We use the same setup. However, it isn’t perfect. I recently loaded a minivan on the trailer I have borrowed and from the way the tires bulged we obviously had more weight on the front axle than the rear. It was a front wheel drive minivan so had a lot of weight in front and it was long enough we didn’t have any options with where to position it on the trailer. And the level of the trailer was whatever it was because this was a rescue mission late in the evening using a borrowed trailer with a friend’s truck. But, it wasn’t too far off of level and yet the tires told us we had more weight in front than back.

We made that trip fine, but I’m hearing way too many stories from people I know well about blown tires while towing. Not only did they have to stop and replace the tire, in some cases the loss of one tire led to the loss of the other on the same side. And they were stuck. I don’t want to have that experience. 🙈 That’s the impetus for overkill on the trailer.

Gary, that trailer may have had either no suspension, or like a friend's trailer, torsion bars or rubber springs which do not have the equalizer between the axles. On the dovetail, I never really cared for them, because if you are hauling something long (like a crew cab long bed truck) the rear wheels either end up on the slope or very close and it limits the adjustment range if the vehicle is nose heavy (like truck with a 460 or Diesel). Winch, maybe a high and low mount point so you can still load something with low ground clearance.

FWIW, my 5th wheel had a maximum gross weight of 10,000 lbs, which meant the axles were at least 5000 lb capacity, it used 6 lug 15" wheels and used LR E, I believe, trailer tires. It also had brakes on both axles. One thing you will want, a way to either cut off the brakes or sharply reduce the power to them empty otherwise you will flat spot the tires in a hard stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

....A common suspension set up we use here (you probably do too), has linkages between the axles to allow them to float, while connected to each other.

This way they can travel over uneven ground, curbs, ditches etc. & still have an equal loading on each wheel....

That was my first thought too, and I almost replied with it. But as I thought about it more, I don't think the leaf-spring equalizing setup will equalize for loading very well. I think it's mainly for angle and uneven ground. It's very effective when there's a fair amount of axle movement (like when one tire starts up a curb), but if you have 10% more weight on the front axle the spring won't be flexed that much more so it won't push the rear axle down that much. Maybe I'm wrong and Gary doesn't need to worry about it, but as I thought about it more I think he probably does have a valid concern.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

....A common suspension set up we use here (you probably do too), has linkages between the axles to allow them to float, while connected to each other.

This way they can travel over uneven ground, curbs, ditches etc. & still have an equal loading on each wheel....

That was my first thought too, and I almost replied with it. But as I thought about it more, I don't think the leaf-spring equalizing setup will equalize for loading very well. I think it's mainly for angle and uneven ground. It's very effective when there's a fair amount of axle movement (like when one tire starts up a curb), but if you have 10% more weight on the front axle the spring won't be flexed that much more so it won't push the rear axle down that much. Maybe I'm wrong and Gary doesn't need to worry about it, but as I thought about it more I think he probably does have a valid concern.

Bill - The trailer does have springs and the equalizing link. But Bob is right, those things don’t spread the load all the time, just in bumps. Here’s what eTrailer has to say about them:

Used for multi-axle systems, equalizers are designed to transfer from one axle to another the additional load resulting from bumps. The transfer of load serves to equalize the weight being carried by all axles at the time of impact. Without an equalizer, going over a bump would cause one axle to have a disproportional amount of weight on it. Also, the equalizer allows for a smooth transfer of the impact through the suspension system under the trailer.

So the equalizer doesn’t really spread the load while going down the road. That means loading a trailer to the limit is difficult to do without overloading one axle, and as you said there are times when you don’t have a choice where you load the vehicle due to its length. In those cases you’d better have some reserve built into the load capacity of the trailer.

As for the dovetail, I don’t mind the rear of the vehicle being on the dove - especially with a 4’ dove since the angle is effectively half that of a 2’ dove. I chain the vehicle so that it can’t possible shift in any direction, so the dove doesn’t cause a problem with the height of the rear of the vehicle. But maybe I’m missing your point.

On the winch height, most vehicles I’ve hauled have rolled well enough when loaded that getting it to the front without the winch being on the deck wouldn’t be a problem. But I see what you are saying about a high/low location option being helpful. However, it seems to me like the low position would always cause the winch lead to hit the deck as the front of the vehicle starts up the ramp. And the shorter the dovetail the greater the angle the line will have to make.

As for the brakes, I have adjustable brake controllers for both of my trucks. Unfortunately even the ‘15 model’s factory controller doesn’t have memory for different controller settings so you have to remember the best setting or test it each time, but testing proves the brakes work, so that’s a good test to make anyway.

Bob - I think we are in agreement. 👍

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill - The trailer does have springs and the equalizing link. But Bob is right, those things don’t spread the load all the time, just in bumps. Here’s what eTrailer has to say about them:

Used for multi-axle systems, equalizers are designed to transfer from one axle to another the additional load resulting from bumps. The transfer of load serves to equalize the weight being carried by all axles at the time of impact. Without an equalizer, going over a bump would cause one axle to have a disproportional amount of weight on it. Also, the equalizer allows for a smooth transfer of the impact through the suspension system under the trailer.

So the equalizer doesn’t really spread the load while going down the road. That means loading a trailer to the limit is difficult to do without overloading one axle, and as you said there are times when you don’t have a choice where you load the vehicle due to its length. In those cases you’d better have some reserve built into the load capacity of the trailer.

As for the dovetail, I don’t mind the rear of the vehicle being on the dove - especially with a 4’ dove since the angle is effectively half that of a 2’ dove. I chain the vehicle so that it can’t possible shift in any direction, so the dove doesn’t cause a problem with the height of the rear of the vehicle. But maybe I’m missing your point.

On the winch height, most vehicles I’ve hauled have rolled well enough when loaded that getting it to the front without the winch being on the deck wouldn’t be a problem. But I see what you are saying about a high/low location option being helpful. However, it seems to me like the low position would always cause the winch lead to hit the deck as the front of the vehicle starts up the ramp. And the shorter the dovetail the greater the angle the line will have to make.

As for the brakes, I have adjustable brake controllers for both of my trucks. Unfortunately even the ‘15 model’s factory controller doesn’t have memory for different controller settings so you have to remember the best setting or test it each time, but testing proves the brakes work, so that’s a good test to make anyway.

Bob - I think we are in agreement. 👍

This might be too far out there, but I think a full air suspension might give actual load equalizing if you plumbed the front and rear air bags together. That way the pressure in each bag would be the same. Given that the area is also the same it would stand to reason that the force would be the same too. Still, a little overkill with a simpler leaf-spring setup is probably a better choice. And unless the cross-over plumbing was really big that setup might not give quick enough response for equalizing bumps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might be too far out there, but I think a full air suspension might give actual load equalizing if you plumbed the front and rear air bags together. That way the pressure in each bag would be the same. Given that the area is also the same it would stand to reason that the force would be the same too. Still, a little overkill with a simpler leaf-spring setup is probably a better choice. And unless the cross-over plumbing was really big that setup might not give quick enough response for equalizing bumps.

Yes, air suspension should give equalized loading. But the lines between the axles would have to be large in order to allow quick changes when you hit bumps. That could cause problems since moving a vehicle to the front would cause the front to go down and the rear to go up, making leveling more difficult.

I agree with the overkill idea on a simple spring arrangement being better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, air suspension should give equalized loading. But the lines between the axles would have to be large in order to allow quick changes when you hit bumps. That could cause problems since moving a vehicle to the front would cause the front to go down and the rear to go up, making leveling more difficult.

I agree with the overkill idea on a simple spring arrangement being better.

Have you considered loading the trailered vehicle backwards so the engine is not putting all the weight on the front axle?

I've never owned a car trailer but I have rented them from uhaul.

Usually I just borrow a flatbed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you considered loading the trailered vehicle backwards so the engine is not putting all the weight on the front axle?

I've never owned a car trailer but I have rented them from uhaul.

Usually I just borrow a flatbed.

My brother and I talked about loading backwards just today. That was in the midst of the conversation about drive-over fenders. Turns out that Big Blue’s front tires measure 81” outside where they meet the pavement, and probably closer to 83” at max width. And the distance between fenders on most of the trailers is 82”. So it is going to be close with the front tires, but the back track is less so backing on might work better.

However, one dream I have is building a Bronco with big tires and that wouldn’t fit between the fenders. So I’m considering drive-over fenders so I can put anything on it. Yesterday I talked with a couple of guys with a big-tired late model Jeep on a trailer and they said everyone is going for drive-overs as nothing with big tires fits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...