Jump to content
Bullnose Forums

Bumper brackets [E0TZ-17788-C & E0TZ-17787-C?] - NOS


Recommended Posts

Well, my Feb '82 MPC, courtesy Numberdummy, gives the same info as the later MPC's. :nabble_anim_confused:

Then it has to be a typo, or a part that was superseded by 1982 by another part number.

I doubt that it was superseded, because I would assume (Yes I Know :nabble_smiley_thinking:) it would still have it in a 1982 book, just R/B'd to the new Part Number.

So my best guess is a typo, and possibly a reason why it never sold, etc. . .

I like a good mystery too, but this one we may never solve.

:nabble_smiley_unhappy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then it has to be a typo, or a part that was superseded by 1982 by another part number.

I doubt that it was superseded, because I would assume (Yes I Know :nabble_smiley_thinking:) it would still have it in a 1982 book, just R/B'd to the new Part Number.

So my best guess is a typo, and possibly a reason why it never sold, etc. . .

I like a good mystery too, but this one we may never solve.

:nabble_smiley_unhappy:

I agree - the '82 MPC should have had the R/B if it had been replaced. But as of Feb '82 it looks like not. Especially since the prefixes are E0TZ, and if they'd been replaced in '81 or '82 they'd have been different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree - the '82 MPC should have had the R/B if it had been replaced. But as of Feb '82 it looks like not. Especially since the prefixes are E0TZ, and if they'd been replaced in '81 or '82 they'd have been different.

Mystery solved...?

From page 633 of the "Obsolete - Supercede - Interchange Manual FPS 7632-5 January 1994":

E0TZ-17787-C R/B E0TZ-17787-F, and E0TZ-17788-C R/B E0TZ-17788-D

E0TZ17787C-F.png.93ee94051f328189333d20bdf46a5195.png

E0TZ17788C-D.png.124b7e3920c24fdc879a2783daa19265.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...