Jump to content
Bullnose Forums

Aftermarket EFI installation - Questions


Recommended Posts

Hi Gents,

So after a lot of daydreaming and thinking, I'm contemplating an EFI swap. I'm actually contemplating several things...EFI swap, 3G swap, Serpentine drive swap, etc. Then there's an AC install, and possibly a gear ratio swap...the list is potentially endless, I guess.

Anyway, I know there are some members on here that have done this already (Jacob84, and others?), and some that are planning on it soon (Rusty_S85), and then several of you that have done factory EFI swaps.

I've been reading about the various kits for hours, and it basically comes down to the Holley Sniper, the FiTech #30003, and Summit's MAX efi 500 kit. Oh...and I guess possibly a factory style EFI w/MAF swap, maybe.

The Holley Sniper kit seems to be regarded as the best-ish of the bunch, but it's also a little more expensive. I like the simplicity of the FiTech kit (and the price), but Google searches seem to bring up a lot of complaints. Then there's guys that say most of the problems have to do with user errors and installation errors...I dunno. It's hard to read. I'm not opposed to a factory style EFI w/MAF swap...the trouble is finding good parts to use. Maybe somebody could tell me what I'd need to do this? Is it tunable?

I'm mainly looking for input, or guidance on the basics of the aftermarket kits. I guess I'd need something similar to a factory fuel supply system? With an in-tank lift pump, which supplies a high pressure pump which supplies the throttle body unit?

I've read reports where bolt-on aftermarket EFI systems should not be used with dual plane intake manifolds (which I have). However, I've read where people have installed them with dual planes and had no complaints.

I don't dislike my Holley carb, and it actually works well, but I'm much more comfortable tuning EFI. I've done quite a bit of this in the past.

I'm not even 100% sure that I will even do this...as I said, right now I'm just exploring the options, and looking for pros, cons, and real world experience and results.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Factory EEC-V EFI is tunable, but it isn't cheap. I think I paid $600 for the hardware and software to do it, not including the EFI stuff itself. And then you have to tune it, and I don't think it is anything nearly as easy as with an aftermarket system.

However, when you are done you have something that you could take to most mechanics and have the codes read and parts replaced. I'm not sure how true that is of aftermarket.

Most of the aftermarket I've seen is throttle body rather than port injection, so properly set up the factory stuff will be more accurate. But the aftermarket will still be better than a carb, so the ease of installation and tuning may be worth it.

For a fuel system, I went with the later fuel delivery modules. They have been used for many years, and much more recently than the Bullnose stuff, so should be available much longer. The only issue is making the sending unit work with the Bullnose gauge, and a Meter Match does that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a fuel system, I went with the later fuel delivery modules. They have been used for many years, and much more recently than the Bullnose stuff, so should be available much longer. The only issue is making the sending unit work with the Bullnose gauge, and a Meter Match does that.

Do the later fuel systems have enough pressure that a second fuel pump is not required?

Where did you install the Meter Match module?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a fuel system, I went with the later fuel delivery modules. They have been used for many years, and much more recently than the Bullnose stuff, so should be available much longer. The only issue is making the sending unit work with the Bullnose gauge, and a Meter Match does that.

Do the later fuel systems have enough pressure that a second fuel pump is not required?

Where did you install the Meter Match module?

Yes, they do - at least they have enough pressure for the factory EFI systems, although I don't remember what that is. The Fuel Delivery Modules have the pump, sending unit, and switching valve in them. So you have two nylon hoses, supply and return, with a wye to go to the front tank if you have two tanks - which you won't have. Right? Anyway, everything is done in the FDM.

But, if you are running only one tank then you do have more options that those of us with dual tanks. No need for the switching valve, for instance. So grafting an aftermarket pump into the existing sending unit is reasonable.

As for the Meter Match, I put it under the steering column. Drop the filler panel under the column and there it is in case you want to recalibrate it. You place it between the sending unit and the gauge, and you need power and ground as well. Since you have to calibrate it after installation you don't want it in an inaccessible place.

Speaking of which, you have three possible set points: Full; Mid; Empty. You don't have to play with Mid, but you do the other two. But Mid helps as the potentiometer is apparently not linear and the gauge will drop pretty rapidly and then stay just above Empty for a loooooong time. But setting Mid helps that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a fuel system, I went with the later fuel delivery modules. They have been used for many years, and much more recently than the Bullnose stuff, so should be available much longer. The only issue is making the sending unit work with the Bullnose gauge, and a Meter Match does that.

Do the later fuel systems have enough pressure that a second fuel pump is not required?

Where did you install the Meter Match module?

Ford changed from the external frame mounted pump a reservoir/switching valve for the 1990 model year to the FDM design. If you have the large opening fuel tank(s) the FDM will go through the opening, but the alignment tabs are wrong. A 1990 up tank for the same chassis will go right on with no problems and if you can find a matching filler neck then the whole system will be updated like I did with Darth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ford changed from the external frame mounted pump a reservoir/switching valve for the 1990 model year to the FDM design. If you have the large opening fuel tank(s) the FDM will go through the opening, but the alignment tabs are wrong. A 1990 up tank for the same chassis will go right on with no problems and if you can find a matching filler neck then the whole system will be updated like I did with Darth.

Ok, understood. So the later in-tank fuel delivery modules are putting out something like 60+ PSI then? So no need for a booster/high pressure pump on the frame?

I have the old style tank with small opening, but that's fine, I wouldn't mind going with a later tank and fuel delivery module if all I need is a Meter Match to make my gauge work.

I'm just looking for the simplest of all solutions here, should I decide to do this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, understood. So the later in-tank fuel delivery modules are putting out something like 60+ PSI then? So no need for a booster/high pressure pump on the frame?

I have the old style tank with small opening, but that's fine, I wouldn't mind going with a later tank and fuel delivery module if all I need is a Meter Match to make my gauge work.

I'm just looking for the simplest of all solutions here, should I decide to do this.

Right on all counts, Cory & Bill.

Big Blue is sporting mid-90's tanks, FDM's, & filler necks. And the plumbing is all new nylon hose with the proper connectors. Makes it simple to support later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right on all counts, Cory & Bill.

Big Blue is sporting mid-90's tanks, FDM's, & filler necks. And the plumbing is all new nylon hose with the proper connectors. Makes it simple to support later.

Oh, I forgot to add, if you shop around there are good deals on the tank with the FDM installed. I got the two of them shipped to me in one box for quite a bit less than the two would have cost individually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right on all counts, Cory & Bill.

Big Blue is sporting mid-90's tanks, FDM's, & filler necks. And the plumbing is all new nylon hose with the proper connectors. Makes it simple to support later.

Ok, I guess I better do some research on installing the later tank then, as I'll have to make sure I can use a later model filler neck and hose, etc. Swapping them on a Styleside truck is probably no problem since the bodies didn't change much. On the 1992-1996 Flaresides, I'll have to check and see if I can get obtain/use a filler neck from one of those generation beds. Hmmm.

Thanks for the info Gary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where the sniper gets its following is its all self contained. The ECM and sensors are with in the unit itself and all you have to hook up is a key hot, battery hot, battery ground, and a rpm signal and you are running. Everything else is optional and adds to the ability of the sniper.

Holley also makes the Terminator that has an externally mounted ECM that you can mount anywhere you choose but it involves bundles of wires and large connectors.

The OE system you can run and Holley makes a Terminator wiring harness/ECM to hook up to the OE EFI system making it more like the sniper/terminator when it comes to tuning and data logging.

If I had a OE EFI system I would go the Terminator ECM/harness route. You can now data log and make changes via a hand hell or through a laptop.

But if I did not have EFI nor the EFI components I would go with the Sniper/Terminator as its more cost effective compared to sourcing OE EFI parts and then paying for the Terminator harness on top of it.

I personally picked the 4150 Sniper, it looks like a Holley 4150 double pumper but that wasnt the reason why I picked it, I picked it as it was the only Sniper Holley had with the Ford kick down hook up for a C6 transmission. The plain Sniper doesnt have a Ford kick down but does have a TH250/350 / 700R4 attachment points. Same with the Edelbrock Proflow 4 which is true fuel injection, it does not have a Ford kick down attachment and you will have to run a universal throttle cable as the intake on the ProFlow 4 is a high rise air gap like style.

FiTech I installed 4 of those units some 4/5 years ago now and had nothing but problems with them. Every one of them had failed injectors, every one of them required sitting on hold for 2 to 4 hours to get a walk through of tuning the FiTech as the system on FiTech is a bit more complicated than compared to the sniper. The Sniper complaints online are typically user installation error as Ive installed some 5 or 7 Snipers after we stopped selling FiTechs and havent had one come back with an actual issue. Had one come back but the guy swears up and down the FiTech is running lean causing his engine to over heat. Problem is the Sniper is idling at 12.8:1 which is a little rich so there is no way it is the Sniper causing that issue and the guy refused to let us pull the engine and do a tear down and find out why its over heating. I have heard FiTechs are better now but I havent installed any as the sniper is just such a better system in my eyes. FiTech is what I thought of years ago for my truck but after 4 installs all had injector failures I said nope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...